What is an example of expectancy violation?
Examples of Expectancy Violation Theory If the person takes the unexpected behavior as positive, the person will find ways to continue the conversation accordingly, whereas, if it is taken as negative, the person will find it violating and find ways to stop the conversation.
What does the expectancy violation theory explain?
Explanation of Theory: Expectancy Violation Theory sees communication as the exchange of information which is high in relational content and can be used to violate the expectations of another which will be perceived as either positively or negatively depending on the liking between the two people.
What are expectancy violations quizlet?
Expectancy violations theory. looks specifically at what happens when someone violates our expectations. The theory suggests that we will judge a violation as either good or bad and act accordingly in the conversation. Goal of EVT. Suggests that people hold expectations about the nonverbal behavior of others.
What was the original focus of Burgoon’s expectancy violations theory?
EVT was initially formulated to account for the communicative effects of proxemics violations during interpersonal and group interaction. Proxemics refers to the organization, use, and interpretation of space and distance.
Which of the following is an example of an immediacy behavior?
Immediacy consists of both verbal and nonverbal behaviors. Examples of verbal immediacy behaviors include use of plural pronouns, use of informal manner of address, displaying openness, and use of compliments. Examples of nonverbal immediacy cues include touch, distance, eye contact, body language, and vocal tone.
Who made expectancy violation theory?
Judee K. Burgoon
The theory was proposed by Judee K. Burgoon in the late 1970s and continued through the 1980s and 1990s as “nonverbal expectancy violations theory”, based on Burgoon’s research studying proxemics.
Who created expectancy violation theory?
What does Expectancy Violations Theory suggest if you are trying to persuade another person?
It asserts that when communicative norms are violated, the violation may be perceived either favorably or unfavorably, depending on the perception the receiver has of the violator. Violating another’s expectations is a strategy that may be used rather than conforming to another’s expectations.
Did Burgoon’s original research support her model?
Burgoon’s original theory was not supported by her research, but she has continued to refine her approach to expectancy violations. dropped the concept of the threat threshold. substituted “an orienting response” or a mental “alertness” for “arousal.”