How do Comparativists study politics?

How do Comparativists study politics?

Comparativists (practitioners of comparative politics) seek to identify and understand the similarities and differences among political systems by breaking broad topics such as democracy or freedom down into the factors we find in individual systems.

Which of the following is true of the work of most Comparativists?

Which of the following is true of the work of most comparativists? When they expand study outside of a single country, they tend to limit their focus to a single geographic region.

What do Comparativists do?

The job of the comparativist researcher is to make comparisons less subliminal and random, and more deliberate and systematic, especially in the things that are critical to human life.

What methods are used in comparative politics?

The following tentative classification of levels of comparative analysis was suggested: (1) comparison of a single problem limited to political systems that are homogeneous in character and operation; (2) comparison of several elements or clusters of elements in relation to political systems that are fairly homogeneous …

What is comparative framework?

It is a theoretical field of study that compares education in one country by examining and using evidence and insights drawn from the practices and situation found in other countries (Altbach 1998).

What are the basis for comparative analysis?

Conventionally, comparative analysis emphasized on the “explanation of differences, and the explanation of similarities” (p. 2). This helps to establish relationships between two or more phenomena and provide valid reasons.

What is legitimacy and where does a government get it?

Legitimacy is commonly defined in political science and sociology as the belief that a rule, institution, or leader has the right to govern. It is a judgment by an individual about the rightfulness of a hierarchy between rule or ruler and its subject and about the subordinate’s obligations toward the rule or ruler.

Which of the following characteristics is an illiberal regime likely to have in common with a democratic regime?

Which of the following characteristics is an illiberal regime likely to have in common with a democratic one? The executive, legislature, and judiciary are established and have their respective arenas of authority.

What was a major criticism of comparative politics?

A major criticism of comparative politics at the turn of the twentieth century was that it: was descriptive rather than explanatory. A moment within political science during the 1950s and 1960s to develop general theories about individual political behavior that can be applied across all countries.

What is the nature and scope of comparative politics?

NATURE OF COMPARATIVE POLITICS: Comparative government includes the study of features and legal powers of political institutions existing in various states. It is the study of state and other political institutions in terms of their legal powers, functions, and positions on a comparative basis.

What is a democratic form of government?

Democracy is government in which power and civic responsibility are exercised by all adult citi- zens, directly, or through their freely elected rep- resentatives. Democracy rests upon the principles of majority rule and individual rights.