When was smoking banned in restaurants in Pennsylvania?

2008
Officially called the Clean Indoor Air Act, Pennsylvania’s smoking ban has been in effect since 2008. It prohibits smoking in public places and workplaces, with certain exceptions.

How have smoking bans affected restaurants and bars?

The implementation of smoking bans in bars and restaurants results in an average increase of 0.91 servings of alcohol consumed over the past 30 days among those who drink. This effect is statistically significant at the 1% level and it represents an 4.17% increase in alcohol consumption among drinkers.

Why smoking should be banned in restaurants and pubs?

A smoking ban can prevent people from exposure of second-hand smoke but owners of restaurants have worries that such laws will harm their business. There are argues that such laws will result in a decreasing number of customers who go to restaurants and bars.

Is smoking allowed in restaurants in Pennsylvania?

Currently, it is perfectly legal to smoke in Pennsylvania bars and restaurants that have food sales of 20 percent or less.

When did they ban smoking indoors?

1 July 2007
A smoking ban in England, making it illegal to smoke in all enclosed work places in England, came into force on 1 July 2007 as a consequence of the Health Act 2006.

Can you smoke in restaurants in the US?

Idaho, Louisiana, Florida and Indiana have laws that make restaurants 100% smoke-free, but still allow smoking in bars. NEW YORK (MarketWatch)—While Americans are inhaling less secondhand smoke overall, 16 states in the U.S. still permit smoking statewide in both bars and restaurants.

Why is smoking not allowed in food premises?

Firstly, restaurants make hardly any money out of tobacco with the exception perhaps of specific cigar clubs. Secondly, smoking is an appetite depressant so whilst it stimulates coffee sales it does not encourage the higher ticket food items.

Should smoking be banned in restaurants?

Smoking bans in public places, including restaurants, might be efforts to modify smokers’ utility functions. By making it illegal to smoke in public places, governments drive smoking into private places, if not squarely underground.

Should smoking be allowed in public places?

Consequently, the health of innocent non-smokers who are in public places are being jeopardized against their will. By disallowing people who smoke from smoking in public, it will cause smokers to smoke less. Because smoking is not allowed in public, people are only allowed to smoke in their homes.

Did the UK ban on smoking in public places reduce tobacco use?

The ban on smoking in public places indoors was credited with a big drop in tobacco use in the UK.

Is the externality argument for a smoking ban hypocritical?

So the externality argument seems like a hypocritical and unprincipled argument for a smoking ban. Smoking bans in public places, including restaurants, might be efforts to modify smokers’ utility functions. By making it illegal to smoke in public places, governments drive smoking into private places, if not squarely underground.